例句與造句

1. Hence the name of one of his best-known works " How to Do Things with Words ".
2. "How to Do Things With Words " is based on lectures given at Oxford between 1951 and 1954, and then at Harvard in 1955.
3. The reason for that is that statements are to be understood as an attempt to convince the addressee of something ( Austin's How to do things with words ), alternatively as a request to add some attribute to the model of Paul.
4. Austin visited Harvard and Berkeley in the mid-fifties, in 1955 delivering the William James Lectures at Harvard that would become " How to Do Things With Words ", and offering a seminar on excuses whose material would find its way into " A Plea for Excuses ".
5. The paradigmatic case here is speaking the words " I do . " Breaking with analytic philosophy, Austin argued in " How to Do Things With Words " that a " performative utterance " cannot be said to be either true or false, as a constative utterance might be.
6. It's difficult to find how to do things with words in a sentence. 用how to do things with words造句挺難的
7. There are references to " How To Do Things With Words " in our articles Carlo Penco, Illocutionary act, J . L . Austin, Jacques Derrida, Logical argument, Meaning ( linguistics ), Performative, Performativity, Philosophy of language, Pragmatics, and Speech act.
8. In his 1955 William James lecture series, which were later published under the title " How to Do Things with Words ", J . L . Austin argued against a positivist philosophical claim that the utterances always " describe " or " constate " something and are thus always true or false.
9. Following the usage of, for example, John R . Searle, " speech act " is often meant to refer just to the same thing as the term illocutionary act, which John L . Austin had originally introduced in " How to Do Things with Words " ( published posthumously in 1962 ).
10. According to Austin's original exposition in " How to Do Things With Words ", an illocutionary act is an act ( 1 ) for the performance of which I must make it clear to some other person that the act is performed ( Austin speaks of the'securing of uptake'), and ( 2 ) the performance of which involves the production of what Austin calls'conventional consequences'as, e . g ., rights, commitments, or obligations ( Austin 1975, 116f ., 121, 139 ).